Why COVID-19 vaccine autopsy paper got retracted again! - The Rojak Pot (2024)

Find out why the controversial autopsy paper which claims to show that 74% of deaths were due to the COVID-19 vaccine got retracted again!

COVID-19 Vaccine Autopsy Paper Got Retracted Again!

People are sharing a post (archive) on X (formerly Twitter) by the McCullough Foundation, which announced that its autopsy paper which claims to show that 74% of deaths were due to the COVID-19 vaccinesis being retracted for the “second” time!

Recommended : Did 325 autopsy reports show 74% deaths from Covid vaccines?!

WhyCOVID-19 Vaccine Autopsy Paper Got Retracted Again!

I have earlier covered in detail why this controversial autopsy paper which claims to show that 74% of deaths were due to the COVID-19 vaccines got retracted again.

• Did Autopsies Show COVID-19 Vaccines Caused Deaths?!
• Did 325 autopsy reports show 74% deaths from Covid vaccines?!

I highly encourage you to read both pieces, but in case you are short of time, here’s a quick summary why it was inevitable that this COVID-19 vaccine autopsy paper would get retracted by any reputable scientific journal.

1. This was a “revised” version of an earlier preprint paper, which was removed by The Lancet in July 2023, because the paper violated its screening criteria, and its conclusions were not supported.
2. The authors only went through other people’s papers on autopsies, and made personal judgements on what caused those deaths, based solely on what they read.
3. They only looked at vaccinated people, and excluded unvaccinated people, which introduces bias, and makes it impossible to determine if there is even a signal that those deaths were due to the COVID-19 vaccines.
4. They did not mention using any objective and standardised criteria for determining whether a death is caused by the COVID-19 vaccine.
5. When the same group of researchers posted a review of 28 autopsies that they determined were “likely caused by COVID-19 vaccination”, it was found that many of them had unrelated causes of death!
6. The mean age of death was 70.4 years, which meant that most of the people in this study were elderly. Is it any surprise that the elderly were dying from cardiovascular, haematological, or respiratory problems???

In short, there are so many problems with this paper that it is truly surprising it even passed peer review and was published in Forensic Science International.

Recommended : Cureus Retracts “Peer-Reviewed” COVID-19 Vaccines Paper!

While the study authors are claiming “censorship”, the retraction of a flawed study is not censorship. It is simply part of the scientific review process, albeit a belated correction.

You might have thought that FSI editors would be more wary after a preprint version of this paper with the same title from the same group of researchers got kicked out of Preprints with The Lancet.

While I’m glad this incredibly flawed paper is finally being retracted, I wished I could say it was better late than never. The truth is – this is like shutting the barn door after the horses have bolted.

The authors and anti-vaccine activists have already squeezed whatever publicity, prestige, page views, etc. they can get out of its publication. No one is going to do an apology tour after this paper gets retracted.

Please help us FIGHT FAKE NEWS by sharing this fact check article out, and please SUPPORT our work!

Don’t forget to protect yourself, and your family, by vaccinating against COVID-19!

Recommended Reading

• ABIM revokes Pierre Kory and Paul Marik’s certifications!
• Did his family admit Joe Biden was replaced by body double?!
• Chinese outrage + drama at 2024 Paris Olympics fact checked!
• Was Tim Walz once hospitalised after ingesting horse sem*n?!
• Is Keir Starmer building detainment camps for UK rioters?!

Support Us!

If you like our work, please support us byvisiting our sponsors, ordonating to our fund. Thank you!